Independent verification guide
When a material claim comes from an interested party, independent corroboration matters.
When a material claim comes from an interested party, independent corroboration matters.A confident representation is not the same thing as independently supported evidence, especially when value, risk or reputation depends on it.
Share this guide
Signals that may justify a defined review
When this question becomes worth testing
The source has a commercial or strategic interest in the conclusion.
Supporting material is largely self-produced, repeated or difficult to trace to originals.
Public records, third-party records or chronology may provide an independent test.
Public approach
What an Aperture review is trying to establish
1. Identify the material representation precisely.
2. Trace the claim to its underlying evidence and origin.
3. Test whether apparent corroboration is genuinely independent.
4. Keep contradictions and missing evidence visible in the final reliance finding.
Professional boundary
Where Aperture fits
The objective is not to assume that management is wrong. It is to avoid treating an interested representation as established fact before the available evidence has been tested.
The public guide explains the client-facing logic only. Aperture's detailed non-public methodology, templates and controls remain proprietary.
Advising a client on this issue?
You do not need to absorb this work into your own mandate.
If the factual question sits outside your normal role, you can retain the client relationship and introduce Aperture for the defined evidence-review scope. Aperture performs the agreed work; you remain the adviser where appropriate.
Continue from this point
Related evidence routes
Relevant case
Tingo shows why corporate and promoter representations should be traced to independent evidence.
Open the case →Related guide
Read why management representations are not automatically evidence.
Read the guide →Professional route
See how business brokers and advisers can bring Aperture into client work.
For business brokers →The decision output
You should be able to see three things clearly.
What is supported
The material evidence that can responsibly support the proposition or finding.
What remains uncertain
Contradictions, missing records, assumptions and dependencies that should not disappear during drafting.
What should happen next
Whether the answer is sufficient for the decision, needs further verification or requires specialist escalation.