For Transaction Lawyers

Use Aperture for factual verification without displacing legal judgment or legal advice.

Transaction counsel may identify a factual dependency that matters to legal strategy or transaction risk but requires independent evidence review rather than legal interpretation.

See How Aperture Fits Your Client Work Aperture in 3–5 Minutes

Where the factual boundary appears

Situations where specialist evidence review may fit

A material fact needs to be established from public or supplied records.

A chronology or representation needs independent testing.

The legal team wants the factual record organised before specialist legal analysis.

A public-source question should be documented with contradictions and limitations visible.

Illustrative situation

A target’s “major customer” claim needs a closer look

You are considering a business acquisition. A presentation describes several organisations as major customers, but the supporting material includes old pilot projects.

Which customer relationships are current, contracted and relevant to the acquisition assumption?

What we would examine: Compare the authorised data-room evidence, dates, contracting entities and representations. Distinguish a historical trial from a current relationship.
What you could receive: An acquisition-assumption review with claim-to-source comparisons and questions for your transaction advisers.

How a finding could read, if the evidence supported it

The supplied record supports an earlier pilot. It does not establish a current recurring contract or the revenue attributed to that customer.

Why this helps: Your team can direct further diligence to the assumption that matters to the proposed deal.

This is an illustration, not a completed client assignment or a finding about a real organisation. The actual evidence determines the result.

Relevant public guides

Start with the client problem

Your role remains yours

Aperture is designed to complement, not replace, the professional adviser.

You retain the client relationship and your core mandate. Aperture accepts only the agreed evidence-review scope and does not become the client's transaction lawyers service provider. Where a matter requires legal, financial, tax, technical or other regulated specialist judgment, that dependency remains explicit.

If the same factual uncertainty appears repeatedly across your clients, the relationship can become a channel-partner capability.

Explore Working With Aperture Run the Verification-Need Check