See what is established
Separate verified facts and supported findings from claims, repetition, inference and assumption.
Aperture core product
Enhanced Public-Source Due Diligence
An expanded public-source review across ownership, management, litigation, regulatory history, links and reputation.
This service is one application of Aperture’s controlled evidence-assurance framework. Research is the process. Responsible reliance is the product.
See the work
See this standard in practice.
Review Selected Work and clearly labelled examples, then consider how a comparable evidence-assurance assignment could be scoped for your decision.
US and regulated-matter review
US-facing assignments are accepted only after jurisdictional, intended-use, data and professional-boundary review. Aperture does not provide consumer reports, employment or tenant screening, licensed private-investigator services, legal advice, regulated KYC or AML certification, or eligibility determinations. Restricted government, export-controlled, protected health and regulated financial-customer information is not accepted without separate written approval and suitable controls.
Read the US assignment acceptance policyWhen to use it
An expanded public-source review across ownership, management, litigation, regulatory history, links and reputation. It is most useful where the question can be defined, the intended user is known and the available evidence can be assessed within a proportionate scope.
What Aperture investigates
- The central claim, question or decision
- Source authority, independence and date
- Contradictions and alternative explanations
- Chronology, calculations and document relationships where relevant
- Evidence gaps, uncertainty and specialist escalation needs
What you receive
A structured due-diligence report with source register, chronology, red flags, evidence gaps and limitations.
Indicative range
US$5,000–US$10,000
Final pricing depends on scope, evidence volume, jurisdiction, urgency, intended use and specialist requirements.
What it does not provide
The output does not guarantee an outcome, replace regulated professional advice, create legal privilege, certify compliance or transfer decision responsibility from the client. Any work requiring licensed, regulated or specialist capability must be separately scoped or escalated.
Client responsibility
Aperture informs the decision. It does not make the decision.
Aperture identifies what the evidence supports, what remains uncertain and what should not yet be relied upon. The client retains responsibility for the final commercial, legal, investment, publication, governance or operational decision.
What the work involves
Human research and review are performed for the agreed scope.
The work may include locating public records, reviewing corporate and regulatory filings, testing representations, constructing timelines, comparing related entities, identifying inconsistencies and documenting unresolved matters.
Client outcome
How this helps you make the decision
Aperture is not adding research for its own sake. The work is scoped around the decision you need to make and the evidence that could materially change it.
See what could change the answer
Keep contradictions, missing evidence, alternative explanations and specialist dependencies visible before reliance.
Know the responsible next step
Understand what the evidence supports now, what it does not support and whether further work is proportionate.
See the capability in context
Tingo Mobile portfolio case
See how Aperture applies public-source due diligence, independent-corroboration testing, contradiction analysis and reliance discipline to a high-consequence counterparty decision.
Explore the Tingo Case Summary