Test whether a vendor's material performance, accuracy, safety, source or governance claims are supported.
Aperture core product
AI Reliance & Claims Verification
Independent testing of the material proposition behind an AI-assisted decision, whether it originated from a vendor, internal copilot, agent, generated report or deployed system.
This service is one application of Aperture’s controlled evidence-assurance framework. Research is the process. Responsible reliance is the product.
See the work
See this standard in practice.
Review Selected Work and clearly labelled examples, then consider how a comparable evidence-assurance assignment could be scoped for your decision.
When to use it
Test whether a generated claim, summary, score or recommendation can responsibly support the intended decision.
Identify where AI output has become a business input without a sufficient independent verification record.
Use it before adopting an AI product, before relying on an AI-generated finding, or after deployment when generated output is already influencing consequential decisions.
What Aperture investigates
- The material proposition and the decision that depends on it
- The source trail, benchmark, calculation or evidence beneath the AI output
- Source independence, omissions, contradictions and unsupported inference
- The difference between generated synthesis and original evidence
- The limits of reliance and any legal, cybersecurity or technical specialist dependency
What you receive
A proposition register, source and contradiction review, evidence gaps, specialist dependencies and a written reliance finding.
Indicative range
US$3,000–US$7,500
Final pricing depends on scope, evidence volume, jurisdiction, urgency, intended use and specialist requirements.
What it does not provide
The output does not guarantee an outcome, replace regulated professional advice, create legal privilege, certify compliance or transfer decision responsibility from the client. Any work requiring licensed, regulated or specialist capability must be separately scoped or escalated.
Client responsibility
Aperture informs the decision. It does not make the decision.
Aperture identifies what the evidence supports, what remains uncertain and what should not yet be relied upon. The client retains responsibility for the final commercial, legal, investment, publication, governance or operational decision.
What the work involves
Human research and review are performed for the agreed scope.
The work may include extracting material claims, opening and checking cited sources, locating primary records, testing whether citations support the precise wording, identifying independent corroboration, searching for omitted contrary evidence, assessing overstatement and preparing a documented human-reviewed finding.
Client outcome
How this helps you make the decision
Aperture is not adding research for its own sake. The work is scoped around the decision you need to make and the evidence that could materially change it.
See what is established
Separate verified facts and supported findings from claims, repetition, inference and assumption.
See what could change the answer
Keep contradictions, missing evidence, alternative explanations and specialist dependencies visible before reliance.
Know the responsible next step
Understand what the evidence supports now, what it does not support and whether further work is proportionate.