LP12 · Research-integrity offices, universities, publishers, editors and funders

Reconstruct the source trail without presuming misconduct.

Aperture can independently test whether a cited source supports a statement, whether evidence chains are circular or derivative, and where provenance or chronology remains unresolved.

Where the factual boundary appears

Situations where a defined independent evidence check may fit

A citation may not support the proposition attributed to it.

A source trail is circular, derivative or incomplete.

AI-assisted or third-party research output needs verification.

Chronology or provenance needs neutral reconstruction.

What Aperture can test

Keep the first scope narrow enough to answer the real decision question.

Citation support

Primary-source traceability

Circular citation detection

Typical evidence scope
  • Citation support
  • Primary-source traceability
  • Circular citation detection
  • Provenance reconstruction
  • Unresolved evidence gaps

Professional boundary

Aperture supplies the evidence layer. The professional decision remains where it belongs.

Aperture does not determine misconduct, disciplinary findings or academic sanctions.

Every matter remains subject to fit, lawful-use, jurisdiction, conflict, capacity and confidentiality controls before acceptance.

Useful next routes

Go deeper only where it helps the decision.

Send one narrowly defined factual proposition. Start with the smallest responsible evidence scope.

Discuss a Matter
V168