APERTURE

Know what you can responsibly rely on.

Independent evidence assurance for material factual questions where a transaction, litigation, regulatory action, investment, board decision, procurement commitment, dispute or other consequence-bearing decision requires stronger scrutiny.

When to use it

What this product is for

  • Material proposition identification
  • Evidence lineage and source independence
  • Primary-source prioritisation
  • Contradiction and chronology testing
  • Evidence gaps and unresolved uncertainty
  • Explicit reliance boundary

What you send

Start with the material.

A question, document, report, claim set, named subject, agreed monitoring topic or recurring research request is enough to begin. Aperture confirms the appropriate scope before paid work starts.

Boundary: Aperture Research Works does not provide statutory audit, certification, legal representation or reserved professional opinions unless lawfully authorised and appropriately qualified.

Indicative pricing

Start with the smallest responsible scope.

Quick Evidence Check

US$750 fixed where the evidence burden genuinely fits

Focused Evidence Review

US$1,500-US$3,000

Reality Verification Assessment

US$2,500-US$5,500

Claims & Evidence Audit

US$3,000-US$7,500

Transaction-Critical Evidence Validation

US$5,000-US$8,000

Enhanced Due Diligence

US$5,000-US$10,000

Investigative Research Dossier

US$8,000-US$16,000

Complex / Multistage

US$16,000-US$30,000+

Indicative corridors, not automatic price promises. Actual scope depends on evidence burden, documents, sources, jurisdictions, freshness, specialist complexity, output depth and urgency.

Responsible reliance

Five sources may still be one claim.

Aperture traces apparent corroboration to its originating source, distinguishes repeated assertion from genuinely independent evidence, and states where reliance should stop.

SUPPORTEDSUPPORTED WITH LIMITATIONSNOT ESTABLISHEDCONTRADICTEDFURTHER VERIFICATION REQUIRED

Pre-Analytical Evidence Validation

Test the factual input before specialist analysis depends on it.

AI-Assisted Decision Evidence Validation

Test citations, source chains and material claims before consequential reliance.

Transaction Evidence & CARVE

Verify transaction-perimeter facts, entity continuity and regulatory lineage.

Independence: Our fee does not depend on the conclusion. The customer may choose the question. The evidence determines the finding.

Inspect the output

Three public demonstrations

Cover of 23andMe: What Did the Privacy Promise Actually Support?
APERTURE

23andMe: What Did the Privacy Promise Actually Support?

Genomics / privacy

What did the privacy promise actually support when 23andMe entered bankruptcy?

54 pages · 12 sources · 18 controlled propositions · Research readiness 95/100

Cover of Synapse Financial Technologies: Counterparty Reality Before Reliance
APERTURE

Synapse Financial Technologies: Counterparty Reality Before Reliance

Fintech / banking

What did the post-failure record establish about the evidence required before relying on a fintech platform’s representation of customer funds?

48 pages · 12 sources · 18 controlled propositions · Research readiness 95/100

Cover of Northvolt: Claims, Capacity and Execution Against the Public Record
APERTURE

Northvolt: Claims, Capacity and Execution Against the Public Record

Battery manufacturing

Did financing, orders, installed capability and delivery establish sustainable Northvolt execution at the scale implied?

30 pages · 12 sources · 18 controlled propositions · Research readiness 95/100

Discuss a MatterWA