Quick Review
From US$495
REVIEW
Test the answer you already have.
Independent review of an existing report, memorandum, AI output, analysis, board paper, market study, diligence pack or other answer. REVIEW tests the evidentiary foundation without assuming the original work is wrong.
When to use it
What this product is for
- Source quality and provenance
- Circular or dependent sourcing
- Missing or contradictory evidence
- Outdated facts and hidden limitations
- Whether conclusions exceed what the evidence supports
What you send
Start with the material.
A question, document, report, claim set, named subject, agreed monitoring topic or recurring research request is enough to begin. Aperture confirms the appropriate scope before paid work starts.
Boundary: If the intended use becomes materially consequence-bearing, route to APERTURE rather than increasing REVIEW depth indefinitely.
Indicative pricing
Start with the smallest responsible scope.
Structured Review
US$1,000-US$2,000
Deep Review
US$2,500-US$4,000+
Indicative corridors, not automatic price promises. Actual scope depends on evidence burden, documents, sources, jurisdictions, freshness, specialist complexity, output depth and urgency.
Inspect the output
Three public demonstrations
REVIEW
Mata v. Avianca: When an AI Answer Looks Like Legal Research
Legal / AI-assisted research
Does AI-assisted legal research survive direct source verification?
REVIEW
CrowdStrike: Did the Evidence Verify Both the Cause and the Fix?
Cybersecurity
Did the public evidence establish both the cause of the CrowdStrike outage and the remediation that followed?
REVIEW
Global EV Outlook 2026: Observation, Projection and Assumption
Automotive / EV
Which EV conclusions are observations, projections or assumption-dependent?