LP03 · Investigations counsel, corporate investigations, compliance, ethics and internal-audit teams
Your team runs the investigation. Aperture independently tests the external facts.
Aperture can take a bounded, non-confidential factual proposition and trace the public-source evidence around chronology, entities, relationships and prior representations.
Where the factual boundary appears
Situations where a defined independent evidence check may fit
A chronology depends on public or third-party records.
Entity or relationship mapping sits outside the team’s core document review.
A second independent source check would reduce reliance risk.
What Aperture can test
Keep the first scope narrow enough to answer the real decision question.
Public-record chronology
Ownership and relationships
Regulatory and corporate history
Typical evidence scope
- Public-record chronology
- Ownership and relationships
- Regulatory and corporate history
- External corroboration
- Contradictions and non-corroboration
Professional boundary
Aperture supplies the evidence layer. The professional decision remains where it belongs.
Counsel or the internal team retains privilege, legal strategy, interviews, discovery, disciplinary decisions and regulator engagement.
Every matter remains subject to fit, lawful-use, jurisdiction, conflict, capacity and confidentiality controls before acceptance.