For Fractional CFOs

Add evidence assurance when a board, owner or investor needs a factual proposition independently tested.

Fractional CFOs often see issues before they become formal diligence workstreams: supplier claims, counterparty concerns, management assumptions and disputed external facts.

Where the factual boundary appears

Situations where specialist evidence review may fit

A board decision depends on an external factual assumption.

A supplier, customer or counterparty representation needs independent corroboration.

Numbers may be internally correct but depend on weak external inputs.

The CFO needs an evidence layer without expanding the finance mandate into investigation.

Relevant public guides

Start with the client problem

Your role remains yours

Aperture is designed to complement, not replace, the professional adviser.

You retain the client relationship and your core mandate. Aperture accepts only the agreed evidence-review scope and does not become the client's fractional cfos service provider. Where a matter requires legal, financial, tax, technical or other regulated specialist judgment, that dependency remains explicit.

If the same factual uncertainty appears repeatedly across your clients, the relationship can become a channel-partner capability.

Discuss a Matter
V168