For Angel groups, family offices and small private investment firms
Know which material investment claims can be independently supported.
Know which material investment claims can be independently supported.A private company’s pitch relies on partnerships, customers, intellectual property or traction you cannot confirm from the supplied deck.
A headline customer logo, application number or draft agreement may not substantiate the investment narrative implied by the presentation.
A real person scopes, researches, checks and signs off the evidence work. Technology assists; it does not approve findings.
The decision on your desk
Which issuer claims deserve reliance before the next investment committee decision?
The company describes a major commercial partnership and valuable patents, but the details in public records and attached exhibits are incomplete.
Avoid repeating investor-deck assertions as independently verified facts.
Request the right evidence before paying for deeper due diligence.
Give decision-makers a transparent account of what remains unknown.
The actual work
What our people will examine for you.
Each line connects to a material question in your decision. We test what the record supports and what it does not, rather than producing a generic AI summary.
Isolate the ten claims that materially influence the investment thesis.
Verify registry and company identity within lawful public-source limits.
Trace claimed patents, assignments and application status to relevant registers.
Distinguish customer anecdotes, signed arrangements and substantiated revenue.
Compare disclosed partnerships with the actual counterparties and dates in the materials.
Produce an evidence checklist for the next committee or counsel request.
Your deliverables
A completed dossier your team can act on.
We turn the collected evidence into named findings, identified gaps and next actions. A human reviewer remains accountable for the scope, interpretation and release.
- Investment-claim evidence and confidence matrix
- Patent and counterparty attribution schedule where relevant
- Material inconsistency and alternative-explanation log
- Questions for issuer, investment committee and advisers
- Dated original-source register
- Human-reviewed decision brief
Complete 11-page example of report structure, evidence reasoning, calculations and limitations. The illustrated case is fictional, not a previous client assignment.
Low-friction engagement
Know the price. Send a short brief. Receive the acceptance terms in writing.
Tell us the decision
Send the name, your deadline and the 2–3 claims or records you need resolved. No phone call, budget questionnaire or data room on first contact.
A real person checks fit
We check conflict, legal permissions, sources and competence. You receive a written scope, start date and the fixed fee or a clearly explained change if your matter falls outside the published limits.
We deliver evidence you can inspect
Our people test the sources, check calculations, record contradictions and deliver the report. You receive one written clarification round within the agreed terms.
The standard review
One clear fee. No surprise expansion.
Included scope: One issuer, up to ten material claims and 25 supplied source objects. No investment advice, securities recommendation, valuation, financial audit or legal review.
Timing: Timed to the agreed decision checkpoint and accessible evidence.
For regular users: Request a reusable written standard-scope arrangement. Each matter remains separately priced at its standard approved fee, with no automatic discounts or subscriptions.
Read the complete engagement boundaries and ordering process ↗Ready to proceed?
Request the Private Investment Claims Verification.
You're asking our team to confirm and accept this $3,250 standard bounded review. No payment is taken here. Your message reaches a person, not an automated research checkout.
If your email app does not open, write directly to info@apertureforensic.com with the service name and your decision question.
Before you send
Questions that matter to your purchase
Is the $3,250 fee fixed?
It is the proposed standard fee for the defined scope, pending final written commercial approval. We confirm the actual facts, jurisdiction, records, permitted work and final terms in writing before accepting it. We never add unapproved work to the bill.
Can I use my own AI system instead?
You can use AI for a preliminary review. What you commission here is human-directed independent source work, documented contrary-evidence testing, dated attribution, reviewed calculations and a defensible evidence handoff. If your internal process can already do that adequately, there may be no reason to buy this service.
Can you investigate a confidential matter?
Start with a short non-sensitive outline. A human reviewer confirms conflict checks, lawful source access, privacy safeguards and an appropriate transfer method before we receive confidential files.
Can my team use the review repeatedly?
Yes, subject to each matter being accepted. Repeat matters may use a reusable written scope and simpler onboarding, where appropriate. Each matter retains its standard approved fee and separate acceptance; no automatic discount or subscription applies.