Aperture Research Works

Restructuring & Fiduciary Evidence Desk

Clear written scope. No surprises after acceptance.

Every proposed engagement identifies who instructs us, what public or authorised records are being examined, what we will deliver, and which decisions remain with the professional.

How a matter is commissioned

1. Written question

Describe the matter in public terms only; identify the decision, timing and your role. You do not need a meeting.

2. Independent acceptance check

We check conflicts, authority, privacy, legal restrictions, record-access feasibility and delivery capacity before any confidential file is accepted.

3. Final scope and approval

Written scope states records, entity counts, date cutoffs, output format, fee, paid access costs, exclusions, timing and revision terms.

What the report normally contains

Decision brief

The question, date, material observations, competing explanations and source-confidence limits.

Evidence trail

Source register, retrieved dates, chronology and claim-to-record linkages.

Unresolved issues

Missing instruments, contrary records and questions for counsel or the authorised specialist.

Your named human team

Paul Hattingh

Research direction, evidence-control standards and final human approval of deliverables.

Xandro Hattingh

Written communications, proposal coordination and follow-up with the authorised client.

The roles describe organisational accountability, not a claim that both personally investigate every source in each matter.

View deliverable examplesStart in writing
v236v234