Grantmakers
For the grantmakers team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.
Review scope →Specialist divisions / Nonprofit, Philanthropy & Social Impact Intelligence
Specialist evidence services
Nonprofit, Philanthropy & Social Impact Intelligence
Does grantee identity and project outcome claim have a factual trail?
Who commissions this work
Family Foundations
For the family foundations team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.
Review scope →Ngo Diligence
For the ngo diligence team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.
Review scope →The real purchase trigger
Grant award, new partner, project impact claim
Cross-reference registry, grant, project and impact claims with independent records.
We make the client’s claim, the original record, conflicting sources and the unknowns readable before commitment.
Choose one of eight defined services
Grant Recipient Evidence Brief
One named subject or event; up to three material claims; agreed source jurisdictions and date window. Deliverable: Source coverage sheet, first three contradictions or gaps, clear next-record requests.
Review service and acceptance →Identity decision · Identity & Source Map
One main entity or asset and up to four related names, owners, locations, records or aliases. Deliverable: Entity or asset-resolution table, link-confidence explanation and original source chain.
Review service and acceptance →Claim decision · Material Claims Verification
Up to five numbered claims from a supplied proposal, transaction pack or public statement. Deliverable: Claim-by-claim citations, opposite sources, date-sensitive uncertainty and unproved statements.
Review service and acceptance →Timing decision · Independent Chronology Reconstruction
One bounded event sequence; disclosed evidence window; source provenance and known omissions. Deliverable: Chronology chart, disputed-event table, original-record references and unresolved sequence.
Review service and acceptance →Counterparty decision · Counterparty & Relationship Check
Named entity and up to five related organisations or responsible entities identified from lawful records. Deliverable: Evidence-supported relationship diagram, mismatches, ownership questions and exposure caveats.
Review service and acceptance →Decision-pack review · Decision-Ready Evidence Dossier
One defined commercial decision, six critical questions, specified sources and no unlimited investigation. Deliverable: Executive decision memo, evidence/contradiction matrix, dated primary-source index and recommendations for further questions.
Review service and acceptance →Repeat-work pilot · Repeat-File Evidence Desk
Written pilot of up to ten defined file types, with sampling rules, turnaround assumptions and exclusions. Deliverable: Consistent file-by-file evidence cards, exception register and consolidated management view.
Review service and acceptance →Grant & Impact Claims Watch
One named subject or a written small watchlist; specified public records, cadence, escalation threshold. Deliverable: Dated change log, evidence citations, false-positive dispositions and monthly change summary.
Review service and acceptance →Eight focused specialist pathways
Each pathway has a narrower research question, decision-ready evidence specification, source scope and written-commissioning path.
Nonprofit Organisation Verification
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind nonprofit organisation verification, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Charity Governance Intelligence
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind charity governance intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Grant Recipient Due Diligence Support
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind grant recipient due diligence support, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Philanthropic Funding Intelligence
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind philanthropic funding intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Social Impact Claims Verification
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind social impact claims verification, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →NGO Partnership Intelligence
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind ngo partnership intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Humanitarian Supply Chain Research
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind humanitarian supply chain research, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Nonprofit Regulatory Monitoring
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind nonprofit regulatory monitoring, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Research sources to test
The following sources may support this type of work; their existence is not a claim that a prospective client or named matter has been verified.
US IRS tax-exempt organization search
Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.
Open source →USAspending official API
Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.
Open source →Evidence deliverables and professional limits
What the decision owner receives
- Grant Recipient Evidence Brief
- grantee legal status card
- public funds-to-claim trace
- outcome evidence matrix
- Source-linked claim analysis
- Dated assumptions, contradictions and missing evidence
What remains outside the mandate
No regulated charity audit, assurance of outcomes or unnecessary donor data processing.
Acceptance is conditional on conflict, jurisdiction, lawful access, data protection, capacity and written fee approval.
Start with the decision, not a large retainer
Buyer stages
Match the size of the assignment to the present decision.
Review scope →Example evidence pack
View the contents of an illustrative research output without invented findings.
Review scope →Fees & engagement
Understand written standard-fee proposals, pilot limits and the approval process.
Review scope →Evidence questions worth resolving
Decision questions
Contrary-evidence tests
Division evidence guide (PDF)
Change-monitoring method (PDF)Lawful-source coverage varies. The documents explain the proposed method; no case, professional certification, continuous watch or fee has been approved automatically.