Specialist divisions / Media, Information Integrity & Reputation Intelligence
Specialist evidence services

Media, Information Integrity & Reputation Intelligence

Which statements can be independently sourced and which remain disputed?

Start with Public Claims & Provenance AuditChoose by decision stage

Who commissions this work

Buying role

Editorial Counsel

For the editorial counsel team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.

Review scope →
Buying role

Brand Communications

For the brand communications team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.

Review scope →
Buying role

Publishers

For the publishers team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.

Review scope →

The real purchase trigger

Viral assertion, reputational crisis or disputed public statement

Track original statement, amplification chronology, documentary support and counterevidence.

We make the client’s claim, the original record, conflicting sources and the unknowns readable before commitment.

Choose one of eight defined services

Entry decision

Public Claims & Provenance Audit

One named subject or event; up to three material claims; agreed source jurisdictions and date window. Deliverable: Source coverage sheet, first three contradictions or gaps, clear next-record requests.

Review service and acceptance →
Identity decision

Identity decision · Identity & Source Map

One main entity or asset and up to four related names, owners, locations, records or aliases. Deliverable: Entity or asset-resolution table, link-confidence explanation and original source chain.

Review service and acceptance →
Claim decision

Claim decision · Material Claims Verification

Up to five numbered claims from a supplied proposal, transaction pack or public statement. Deliverable: Claim-by-claim citations, opposite sources, date-sensitive uncertainty and unproved statements.

Review service and acceptance →
Timing decision

Timing decision · Independent Chronology Reconstruction

One bounded event sequence; disclosed evidence window; source provenance and known omissions. Deliverable: Chronology chart, disputed-event table, original-record references and unresolved sequence.

Review service and acceptance →
Counterparty decision

Counterparty decision · Counterparty & Relationship Check

Named entity and up to five related organisations or responsible entities identified from lawful records. Deliverable: Evidence-supported relationship diagram, mismatches, ownership questions and exposure caveats.

Review service and acceptance →
Decision-pack review

Decision-pack review · Decision-Ready Evidence Dossier

One defined commercial decision, six critical questions, specified sources and no unlimited investigation. Deliverable: Executive decision memo, evidence/contradiction matrix, dated primary-source index and recommendations for further questions.

Review service and acceptance →
Repeat-work pilot

Repeat-work pilot · Repeat-File Evidence Desk

Written pilot of up to ten defined file types, with sampling rules, turnaround assumptions and exclusions. Deliverable: Consistent file-by-file evidence cards, exception register and consolidated management view.

Review service and acceptance →
Monitoring pilot

Media Claims & Corrections Watch

One named subject or a written small watchlist; specified public records, cadence, escalation threshold. Deliverable: Dated change log, evidence citations, false-positive dispositions and monthly change summary.

Review service and acceptance →

Eight focused specialist pathways

Each pathway has a narrower research question, decision-ready evidence specification, source scope and written-commissioning path.

Specialist matter

Public Claims Verification

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind public claims verification, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Media Source Reliability Research

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind media source reliability research, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Corporate Media Chronology Reconstruction

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind corporate media chronology reconstruction, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Disinformation Evidence Research

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind disinformation evidence research, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Synthetic Content Provenance Intelligence

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind synthetic content provenance intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Reputational Crisis Evidence Review

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind reputational crisis evidence review, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Public Statement Contradiction Analysis

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind public statement contradiction analysis, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Media Monitoring & Material Change Intelligence

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind media monitoring & material change intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →

Research sources to test

The following sources may support this type of work; their existence is not a claim that a prospective client or named matter has been verified.

Public / commercial starting point

AlphaSense market intelligence platform

Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.

Open source →
Public / commercial starting point

Kroll investigations & diligence services

Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.

Open source →

Evidence deliverables and professional limits

What the decision owner receives

  • Public Claims & Provenance Audit
  • claim origin chain
  • conflicting versions timeline
  • corrections evidence memo
  • Source-linked claim analysis
  • Dated assumptions, contradictions and missing evidence

What remains outside the mandate

Defamation, privacy and right-of-reply safeguards; no deceptive influence campaigns.

Acceptance is conditional on conflict, jurisdiction, lawful access, data protection, capacity and written fee approval.

Start with the decision, not a large retainer

Decision journey

Buyer stages

Match the size of the assignment to the present decision.

Review scope →
Demonstration

Example evidence pack

View the contents of an illustrative research output without invented findings.

Review scope →
Commercial terms

Fees & engagement

Understand written standard-fee proposals, pilot limits and the approval process.

Review scope →

Current sector source anchors and buyer decision kits

Review which original government or institutional records can inform the decision, which claims are still unknown, and which bounded product fits first.

Current evidence context → · Eight commercial products →

Evidence questions worth resolving

Decision questions

    Contrary-evidence tests

      Lawful-source coverage varies. The documents explain the proposed method; no case, professional certification, continuous watch or fee has been approved automatically.

      v234