Family Office Principals
For the family office principals team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.
Review scope →Specialist divisions / Investment, Funds & Capital Markets Intelligence
Specialist evidence services
Investment, Funds & Capital Markets Intelligence
Does a material investment assertion reconcile with primary disclosures?
Who commissions this work
Fund Managers
For the fund managers team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.
Review scope →Investment Advisers
For the investment advisers team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.
Review scope →The real purchase trigger
Disclosure, fundraise, thesis challenge or material company event
Map assertions to dated primary filings, reconcile changes and identify unsupported assumptions.
We make the client’s claim, the original record, conflicting sources and the unknowns readable before commitment.
Choose one of eight defined services
Investment Claim Evidence Brief
One named subject or event; up to three material claims; agreed source jurisdictions and date window. Deliverable: Source coverage sheet, first three contradictions or gaps, clear next-record requests.
Review service and acceptance →Identity decision · Identity & Source Map
One main entity or asset and up to four related names, owners, locations, records or aliases. Deliverable: Entity or asset-resolution table, link-confidence explanation and original source chain.
Review service and acceptance →Claim decision · Material Claims Verification
Up to five numbered claims from a supplied proposal, transaction pack or public statement. Deliverable: Claim-by-claim citations, opposite sources, date-sensitive uncertainty and unproved statements.
Review service and acceptance →Timing decision · Independent Chronology Reconstruction
One bounded event sequence; disclosed evidence window; source provenance and known omissions. Deliverable: Chronology chart, disputed-event table, original-record references and unresolved sequence.
Review service and acceptance →Counterparty decision · Counterparty & Relationship Check
Named entity and up to five related organisations or responsible entities identified from lawful records. Deliverable: Evidence-supported relationship diagram, mismatches, ownership questions and exposure caveats.
Review service and acceptance →Decision-pack review · Decision-Ready Evidence Dossier
One defined commercial decision, six critical questions, specified sources and no unlimited investigation. Deliverable: Executive decision memo, evidence/contradiction matrix, dated primary-source index and recommendations for further questions.
Review service and acceptance →Repeat-work pilot · Repeat-File Evidence Desk
Written pilot of up to ten defined file types, with sampling rules, turnaround assumptions and exclusions. Deliverable: Consistent file-by-file evidence cards, exception register and consolidated management view.
Review service and acceptance →Investment Disclosure Change Watch
One named subject or a written small watchlist; specified public records, cadence, escalation threshold. Deliverable: Dated change log, evidence citations, false-positive dispositions and monthly change summary.
Review service and acceptance →Eight focused specialist pathways
Each pathway has a narrower research question, decision-ready evidence specification, source scope and written-commissioning path.
Investment Claims Verification
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind investment claims verification, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Fund Manager Background Intelligence
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind fund manager background intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Investment Vehicle Structure Research
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind investment vehicle structure research, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Public Company Disclosure Reconciliation
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind public company disclosure reconciliation, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Fundraising Event Intelligence
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind fundraising event intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Institutional Investor Mapping
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind institutional investor mapping, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Investment Thesis Evidence Review
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind investment thesis evidence review, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Capital Markets Event Monitoring
Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind capital markets event monitoring, rather than commission a generic industry report.
Review scope →Research sources to test
The following sources may support this type of work; their existence is not a claim that a prospective client or named matter has been verified.
U.S. SEC EDGAR public filings
Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.
Open source →AlphaSense market intelligence platform
Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.
Open source →Evidence deliverables and professional limits
What the decision owner receives
- Investment Claim Evidence Brief
- thesis assumptions table
- filing change comparison
- source adequacy map
- Source-linked claim analysis
- Dated assumptions, contradictions and missing evidence
What remains outside the mandate
No securities recommendations, investment advice or custody.
Acceptance is conditional on conflict, jurisdiction, lawful access, data protection, capacity and written fee approval.
Start with the decision, not a large retainer
Buyer stages
Match the size of the assignment to the present decision.
Review scope →Example evidence pack
View the contents of an illustrative research output without invented findings.
Review scope →Fees & engagement
Understand written standard-fee proposals, pilot limits and the approval process.
Review scope →Evidence questions worth resolving
Decision questions
- Who made the claim, for which legal vehicle and date?
- Which filed disclosure directly supports the claim versus a derivative slide?
- Which current forms or amendments alter the assertion?
Contrary-evidence tests
Division evidence guide (PDF)
Change-monitoring method (PDF)Lawful-source coverage varies. The documents explain the proposed method; no case, professional certification, continuous watch or fee has been approved automatically.