Specialist divisions / Financial Crime, AML & KYC Intelligence
Specialist evidence services

Financial Crime, AML & KYC Intelligence

Do external identity, ownership and adverse-record signals justify further escalation?

Start with Public-Source Counterparty EDD BriefChoose by decision stage

Who commissions this work

Buying role

Bank Compliance

For the bank compliance team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.

Review scope →
Buying role

Fintech Directors

For the fintech directors team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.

Review scope →
Buying role

Kyc Managers

For the kyc managers team that needs independent sources before an actual spending, legal or operating decision.

Review scope →

The real purchase trigger

Onboarding, unusual-activity escalation, sanctions or politically exposed-person flag

Disambiguate entities, trace official sanctions or ownership entries and preserve provenance.

We make the client’s claim, the original record, conflicting sources and the unknowns readable before commitment.

Choose one of eight defined services

Entry decision

Public-Source Counterparty EDD Brief

One named subject or event; up to three material claims; agreed source jurisdictions and date window. Deliverable: Source coverage sheet, first three contradictions or gaps, clear next-record requests.

Review service and acceptance →
Identity decision

Identity decision · Identity & Source Map

One main entity or asset and up to four related names, owners, locations, records or aliases. Deliverable: Entity or asset-resolution table, link-confidence explanation and original source chain.

Review service and acceptance →
Claim decision

Claim decision · Material Claims Verification

Up to five numbered claims from a supplied proposal, transaction pack or public statement. Deliverable: Claim-by-claim citations, opposite sources, date-sensitive uncertainty and unproved statements.

Review service and acceptance →
Timing decision

Timing decision · Independent Chronology Reconstruction

One bounded event sequence; disclosed evidence window; source provenance and known omissions. Deliverable: Chronology chart, disputed-event table, original-record references and unresolved sequence.

Review service and acceptance →
Counterparty decision

Counterparty decision · Counterparty & Relationship Check

Named entity and up to five related organisations or responsible entities identified from lawful records. Deliverable: Evidence-supported relationship diagram, mismatches, ownership questions and exposure caveats.

Review service and acceptance →
Decision-pack review

Decision-pack review · Decision-Ready Evidence Dossier

One defined commercial decision, six critical questions, specified sources and no unlimited investigation. Deliverable: Executive decision memo, evidence/contradiction matrix, dated primary-source index and recommendations for further questions.

Review service and acceptance →
Repeat-work pilot

Repeat-work pilot · Repeat-File Evidence Desk

Written pilot of up to ten defined file types, with sampling rules, turnaround assumptions and exclusions. Deliverable: Consistent file-by-file evidence cards, exception register and consolidated management view.

Review service and acceptance →
Monitoring pilot

Counterparty Screening Evidence Watch

One named subject or a written small watchlist; specified public records, cadence, escalation threshold. Deliverable: Dated change log, evidence citations, false-positive dispositions and monthly change summary.

Review service and acceptance →

Eight focused specialist pathways

Each pathway has a narrower research question, decision-ready evidence specification, source scope and written-commissioning path.

Specialist matter

AML Public-Source Intelligence

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind aml public-source intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

KYC Entity Verification

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind kyc entity verification, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

PEP Relationship Intelligence

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind pep relationship intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Financial Crime Adverse Media Review

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind financial crime adverse media review, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Shell Company Network Research

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind shell company network research, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Cross-Border Financial Entity Intelligence

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind cross-border financial entity intelligence, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Financial Fraud Pattern Research

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind financial fraud pattern research, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →
Specialist matter

Enhanced Due Diligence Research Support

Test the exact source and contrary evidence behind enhanced due diligence research support, rather than commission a generic industry report.

Review scope →

Research sources to test

The following sources may support this type of work; their existence is not a claim that a prospective client or named matter has been verified.

Public / commercial starting point

US Treasury OFAC sanctions search

Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.

Open source →
Public / commercial starting point

Dun & Bradstreet third-party risk product

Source to test against the actual claim, checked for effective dates, coverage and access limitations. Not a client-specific verification result.

Open source →

Evidence deliverables and professional limits

What the decision owner receives

  • Public-Source Counterparty EDD Brief
  • match disposition table
  • ownership trace
  • escalation questions
  • Source-linked claim analysis
  • Dated assumptions, contradictions and missing evidence

What remains outside the mandate

No regulated AML sign-off, screening guarantee or legal clearance; false positive risk.

Acceptance is conditional on conflict, jurisdiction, lawful access, data protection, capacity and written fee approval.

Start with the decision, not a large retainer

Decision journey

Buyer stages

Match the size of the assignment to the present decision.

Review scope →
Demonstration

Example evidence pack

View the contents of an illustrative research output without invented findings.

Review scope →
Commercial terms

Fees & engagement

Understand written standard-fee proposals, pilot limits and the approval process.

Review scope →

Evidence questions worth resolving

Decision questions

  • Does a potential sanctions hit match stable identifiers or merely the name?
  • What exact reporting and screening obligations apply to the customer type and jurisdiction?
  • Which risk signal is confirmed, false-positive or unresolved?

Contrary-evidence tests

    Lawful-source coverage varies. The documents explain the proposed method; no case, professional certification, continuous watch or fee has been approved automatically.

    v234